Anthropology, Philosophy, and the Challenge of Barbarous Universalism

Authors

  • Joseph Grim Feinberg Institute of Philosophy, Czech Academy of Sciences Autor

Abstract

There is rich tradition of interaction between anthropology and philosophy. This article reflects on the character of this interaction, arguing that it is not a case of two separate, parallel traditions that mutually influence one another, but rather of two interconnected disciplines that have become necessary to one another’s development. Both disciplines aim at a universalistic understanding of the human being, but each does so by different means. Philosophy allows the autonomous work of reason to criticize established categories of thought, positing new concepts of the human; but it risks becoming too autonomous – too self-sufficient and self-referential – thus allowing its categories to become resistant to criticism, established as marks of “civilization” that distinguish philosophical ideas from ideas that are non-philosophical, irrational, and barbarous. Anthropology, for its part, reveals the limitations of premature universalism, pointing to forms of reason excluded from dominant systems of thought. Philosophy can turn to anthropology in order to expand and bring in new concepts. Anthropology can turn to philosophy in order to recall its original impulse toward conceptualizing the universal, in an expansive form that I call “barbarous universalism”.

References

Arola, Adam. 2011. Native American Philosophy. In The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy, edited by William Edelglass and Jay L. Garfield. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press: 562–573.

Baldry, H. C. 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: The University Press.

Bobzien, Susanne. 2020. Ancient Logic. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/logic-ancient/.

Chun, Shan. 2012. Chinese Cosmopolitanism (Tianxia). In Major Aspects of Chinese Religion and Philosophy: Dao of Inner Saint and Outer King by Shan Chun. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 203–212.

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1877. Tusculan Disputations. Translated by C. D. Yonge. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Col, Giovanni da, and Graeber, David. 2011. Foreword: The Return of Ethnographic Theory. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 (1): vi–xxxv.

Cua, Antonio S. 2008. The Emergence of the History of Chinese Philosophy. In The Routledge History of Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bo Mou. London: Routledge: 43–68.

Das, Veena, Jackson, Michael, Kleinman, Arthur, and Singh, Bhrigupati (eds.) 2014. The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy. Durham: Duke University Press Books.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1994. What Is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.

Dismas, Masolo. 2016. African Sage Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/african-sage/.

Durkheim, Émile. 1947. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Translated by Joseph Ward. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

Edelglass, William, and Garfield, Jay L. (eds). 2011. The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Gillon, Brendan. 2023. Logic in Classical Indian Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/logic-india/.

Giri, Ananta Kumar, and Clammer, John (eds). 2013. Philosophy and Anthropology: Border Crossing and Transformations. London: Anthem Press.

Graeber, David. 2014. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Melville House.

Halim, Hala. 2013. Alexandrian Cosmopolitanism: An Archive. Fordham University Press.

Heater, Derek. 1996. World Citizenship and Government: Cosmopolitan Ideas in the History of Western Political Thought. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ilyenkov, Evald, and Korovikov, Valentin Ivanovich. 2019. Theses on the Question of the Interconnection of Philosophy and Knowledge of Nature and Society in the Process of Their Historical Development. In Philosophical Thought in Russia in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century: A Contemporary View from Russia and Abroad, edited by Vladislav A. Lektorsky and Marina F. Bykova, translated by David Bakhurst. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic: 66–77.

Ingold, Tim. 1992. Editorial. Man, New Series, 27 (4): 693–96.

Ingold, Tim. 2008. Anthropology Is Not Ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy 154: 69–92.

Ingold, Tim. 2014. Anthropology and Philosophy or the Problem of Ontological Symmetry. La Clé Des Langues, February. https://cle.ens-lyon.fr/anglais/litterature/entretiens-et-textes-inedits/anthropology-and-philosophy-or-the-problem-of-ontological-symmetry.

Ingold, Tim. 2018. Anthropology: Why It Matters. Cambridge: Polity.

Lavan, Myles, Payne, Richard E., and Weisweiler, John. 2016. Cosmopolitanism and Empire: Universal Rulers, Local Elites, and Cultural Integration in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1964. Totemism. Translated by Rodney Needham. London: Merlin Press.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1985. The View from Afar. Translated by Joachim Neugroschel and Phoebe Hoss. New York: Basic Books.

Lukács, György. 1971a. Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat. In History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press: 83–222.

Lukács, György. 1971b. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Translated by Anna Bostock. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.

Maniglier, Patrice. 2000. L’humanisme Interminable de Lévi-Strauss. Les Temps Modernes, no. 609: 216–241.

Marx, Karl. 1978. Marx on the History of His Opinions. In The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: Norton: 3–6.

Mauss, Marcel. 1967. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by Ian Cunnison. New York: Norton.

Mazzarella, William. 2017. The Mana of Mass Society. Chicago Studies in Practices of Meaning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Radin, Paul. 1927. Primitive Man as Philosopher. New York: Appleton.

Seaford, Richard. 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shell, Marc. 1978. The Economy of Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tamás, Gáspár Miklós. 2010. Communism on the Ruins of Socialism. In Art Always Has Its Consequences. Zagreb: WHW: 75–82.

Tamás, Gáspár Miklós. 2014. Une Promesse de Bonheur: Philosophy as the Antecedent of the Nether World of Communism. In Really Useful Knowledge. Madrid: Museo nacional centro de arte Reina Sofía (MNCARS): 215–230.

Tamás, Gáspár Miklós. 2016. K Filosofii Socialismu. Edited by Pavel Siostzonek and Joseph Grim Feinberg. Translated by Pavel Siostzonek. Filosofia.

Thomson, George. 1949. Studies in Ancient Greek Society. Vol. II: The First Philosophers. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2014. Cannibal Metaphysics. Translated by Peter Skafish. Minneapolis: Univocal.

William, Marshall D. 2023. Logic and Language in Early Chinese Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Stanford, Calif.: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/chinese-logic-language/.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-10

Issue

Section

Articles/Články

How to Cite

Anthropology, Philosophy, and the Challenge of Barbarous Universalism. (2023). Cargo Journal, 21(2), 22-44. http://www.cargojournal.org/index.php/cargo/article/view/9